Challenge
Solution
Success
Story
Challenge
Most companies struggle to ensure that their Program
& Project Management efforts are effective and efficient. If you're not sure how well your company is
doing, ask yourself a few questions:
How successfully do your projects meet stakeholder expectations?
When was last time one of your projects was completed on time and on budget?
How do track whether your projects are on time and on budget?
How effectively are you applying program and project management best practices?
How accurate are your project man-hour estimates?
Who sponsors technology projects, technology leaders or business leaders?
Do your consultants and contractors complete their projects on time and on budget?
How would you compare with mature program and project management organizations?
How effective is your Project Management Office?
For a broader perspective, consider these research statistics from
The Standish Group regarding application development projects:
Average Project Cost for a large
company - $1.2 million
Average Project Cost for a medium
company - $1.1 million
Average Project Cost for a small
company - $0.4 million
Average Project Success Rate for a large
company - 24%
Average Project Success Rate for a medium
company - 28%
Average Project Success Rate for a small
company - 32%
52.7% of projects will cost 189%
of their original estimates
Just for good measure,
do you remember the City of Denver's
fiasco when it built a new airport?
Failure to produce reliable software to handle baggage cost the
city $1.1 million per day
Bottom Line: Your
company's Program & Project
Management capabilities are probably not as effective
and efficient as they should be, but you are not alone.
Improving these capabilities can:
Reduce project costs
Shrink project timelines
Mitigate project risks
Create competitive advantage
Solution
Using our Program
& Project Management service, our clients focus
on their four key goals:
Maximize the quality of the results
Minimize the cost of the results
Minimize the time required to attain the results
Manage risk
According to the Project Management Institute's A Guide to the
Project Management Body of Knowledge, "Project
Management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to
a broad range of activities in order to meet the requirements of the particular project."
Program Management is a broader, more complex service that is
utilized for:
A coordinated portfolio of projects with a common strategic goal
A single, large or very complex project
A set of otherwise unrelated projects bounded by a business cycle
A broad effort encompassing a number of projects
In our Program
& Project Management service, we concentrate on five key process:
Initiating
Planning
Executing
Controlling
Closing
Within each process in the Program &
Project Management lifecycle we continually evaluate the following critical success factors:
Integration
Scope
Time
Cost
Quality
Human Resources
Communications
Risk
Procurement
Additionally,
for Program
Management we provide:
Overall direction and guidance
Assurance that related projects are communicating effectively
A central point of contact and focus for the client and the project teams
Definition and prioritization of individual projects to ensure their successful completion
Mitigation of stakeholders with differing needs and expectations
Coordination of problem and change management The
success of our Program & Project Management service enables our clients' senior executives
to:
Establish measures of success
Enable customer focus and alignment
Quantify value commensurate with cost
Optimize the use of organizational resources
Incorporate quality principles
Put strategic plans into practice
Ensure fast time-to-market
Success Story
Challenge
A Fortune Global 50 financial services company needed
to upgrade its North American technology infrastructure from
token-ring, Banyan Vines, and Windows 95 to Ethernet and the
latest version of Windows for both servers and PCs.
Initially their efforts were separated into three projects:
network migration, server migration, and PC migration.
While this paralleled the internal organizational structure, it
did not account for the communications, integration, and coordination
requirements of the interrelated projects.
Solution
To manage risk and ensure appropriate
communications, integration, and coordination, a Program
Management office was established to oversee the
three Project
Management efforts.
Initially the organization was reluctant to embrace the new governance
model; however, through abundant communications and consistent
enforcement, the Program
Management office was accepted and successful.
Key results of the Program & Project Management teams:
End-user satisfaction exceeded expectations
All Projects were completed on time
All Projects were completed below budget
Testing efforts revealed technology issues in a timely fashion,
avoiding delays and risks
|